test(rules): add final QA evidence and mark review complete
Final Review Results: - F1 (Plan Compliance): OKAY - Must Have [12/12], Must NOT Have [8/8] - F2 (Code Quality): OKAY - All files pass quality criteria - F3 (Manual QA): OKAY - Scenarios [5/5 pass] - F4 (Scope Fidelity): OKAY - No unaccounted changes All 21 tasks complete (T1-T17 + F1-F4)
This commit is contained in:
m3tm3re
153
.sisyphus/evidence/final-qa/summary.md
Normal file
153
.sisyphus/evidence/final-qa/summary.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,153 @@
|
||||
# Opencode Rules Nix Module - Manual QA Results
|
||||
|
||||
## Test Summary
|
||||
Date: 2025-02-17
|
||||
Module: `/home/m3tam3re/p/NIX/nixpkgs/lib/opencode-rules.nix`
|
||||
Test Type: Manual QA (nix eval)
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Scenario Results
|
||||
|
||||
### Scenario 1: Empty Config (Defaults Only)
|
||||
**Command**: `nix eval --impure --json --expr 'let pkgs = import <nixpkgs> {}; m3taLib = import /home/m3tam3re/p/NIX/nixpkgs/lib {lib = pkgs.lib;}; in m3taLib.opencode-rules.mkOpencodeRules { agents = /home/m3tam3re/p/AI/AGENTS; }'`
|
||||
|
||||
**Results**:
|
||||
- ✅ Valid JSON output
|
||||
- ✅ Has `$schema` field in embedded opencode.json
|
||||
- ✅ Has `instructions` field
|
||||
- ✅ Correct instruction count: 6 (default concerns only)
|
||||
|
||||
**Expected Instructions**:
|
||||
1. `.opencode-rules/concerns/coding-style.md`
|
||||
2. `.opencode-rules/concerns/naming.md`
|
||||
3. `.opencode-rules/concerns/documentation.md`
|
||||
4. `.opencode-rules/concerns/testing.md`
|
||||
5. `.opencode-rules/concerns/git-workflow.md`
|
||||
6. `.opencode-rules/concerns/project-structure.md`
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### Scenario 2: Single Language (Python)
|
||||
**Command**: `nix eval --impure --json --expr 'let pkgs = import <nixpkgs> {}; m3taLib = import /home/m3tam3re/p/NIX/nixpkgs/lib {lib = pkgs.lib;}; in m3taLib.opencode-rules.mkOpencodeRules { agents = /home/m3tam3re/p/AI/AGENTS; languages = ["python"]; }'`
|
||||
|
||||
**Results**:
|
||||
- ✅ Valid JSON output
|
||||
- ✅ Has `$schema` field in embedded opencode.json
|
||||
- ✅ Has `instructions` field
|
||||
- ✅ Correct instruction count: 7 (6 concerns + 1 language)
|
||||
|
||||
**Expected Instructions**:
|
||||
- All 6 default concerns
|
||||
- `.opencode-rules/languages/python.md`
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### Scenario 3: Multi-Language
|
||||
**Command**: `nix eval --impure --json --expr 'let pkgs = import <nixpkgs> {}; m3taLib = import /home/m3tam3re/p/NIX/nixpkgs/lib {lib = pkgs.lib;}; in m3taLib.opencode-rules.mkOpencodeRules { agents = /home/m3tam3re/p/AI/AGENTS; languages = ["python" "typescript" "nix" "shell"]; }'`
|
||||
|
||||
**Results**:
|
||||
- ✅ Valid JSON output
|
||||
- ✅ Has `$schema` field in embedded opencode.json
|
||||
- ✅ Has `instructions` field
|
||||
- ✅ Correct instruction count: 10 (6 concerns + 4 languages)
|
||||
|
||||
**Expected Instructions**:
|
||||
- All 6 default concerns
|
||||
- `.opencode-rules/languages/python.md`
|
||||
- `.opencode-rules/languages/typescript.md`
|
||||
- `.opencode-rules/languages/nix.md`
|
||||
- `.opencode-rules/languages/shell.md`
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### Scenario 4: With Frameworks
|
||||
**Command**: `nix eval --impure --json --expr 'let pkgs = import <nixpkgs> {}; m3taLib = import /home/m3tam3re/p/NIX/nixpkgs/lib {lib = pkgs.lib;}; in m3taLib.opencode-rules.mkOpencodeRules { agents = /home/m3tam3re/p/AI/AGENTS; languages = ["python"]; frameworks = ["n8n"]; }'`
|
||||
|
||||
**Results**:
|
||||
- ✅ Valid JSON output
|
||||
- ✅ Has `$schema` field in embedded opencode.json
|
||||
- ✅ Has `instructions` field
|
||||
- ✅ Correct instruction count: 8 (6 concerns + 1 language + 1 framework)
|
||||
|
||||
**Expected Instructions**:
|
||||
- All 6 default concerns
|
||||
- `.opencode-rules/languages/python.md`
|
||||
- `.opencode-rules/frameworks/n8n.md`
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### Scenario 5: Extra Instructions
|
||||
**Command**: `nix eval --impure --json --expr 'let pkgs = import <nixpkgs> {}; m3taLib = import /home/m3tam3re/p/NIX/nixpkgs/lib {lib = pkgs.lib;}; in m3taLib.opencode-rules.mkOpencodeRules { agents = /home/m3tam3re/p/AI/AGENTS; languages = ["python"]; extraInstructions = [".opencode-rules/custom.md"]; }'`
|
||||
|
||||
**Results**:
|
||||
- ✅ Valid JSON output
|
||||
- ✅ Has `$schema` field in embedded opencode.json
|
||||
- ✅ Has `instructions` field
|
||||
- ✅ Correct instruction count: 8 (6 concerns + 1 language + 1 custom)
|
||||
|
||||
**Expected Instructions**:
|
||||
- All 6 default concerns
|
||||
- `.opencode-rules/languages/python.md`
|
||||
- `.opencode-rules/custom.md`
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Content Quality Spot Checks
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. coding-style.md (Concern Rule)
|
||||
**Assessment**: ✅ High Quality
|
||||
- Clear critical rules with "Always/Never" directives
|
||||
- Good vs. bad code examples
|
||||
- Comprehensive coverage: formatting, patterns, error handling, type safety, function design, SOLID
|
||||
- Well-structured sections
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. python.md (Language Rule)
|
||||
**Assessment**: ✅ High Quality
|
||||
- Modern toolchain recommendations (uv, ruff, pyright, pytest, hypothesis)
|
||||
- Common idioms with practical examples
|
||||
- Anti-patterns with explanations
|
||||
- Project setup structure
|
||||
- Clear, actionable code snippets
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. n8n.md (Framework Rule)
|
||||
**Assessment**: ✅ High Quality
|
||||
- Concise workflow design principles
|
||||
- Clear naming conventions
|
||||
- Error handling patterns
|
||||
- Security best practices
|
||||
- Actionable testing guidelines
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Issues Encountered
|
||||
|
||||
### Socket File Issue
|
||||
**Issue**: `nix eval` failed with `error: file '/home/m3tam3re/p/AI/AGENTS/.beads/bd.sock' has an unsupported type`
|
||||
|
||||
**Workaround**: Temporarily moved `.beads` directory outside the AGENTS tree during testing
|
||||
|
||||
**Root Cause**: Nix attempts to evaluate/store the `agents` path recursively and encounters unsupported socket files (Unix domain sockets)
|
||||
|
||||
**Recommendation**: Consider adding `.beads` to `.gitignore` and excluding it from path evaluation if possible, or document this limitation for users
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Final Verdict
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
Scenarios [5/5 pass] | VERDICT: OKAY
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Summary
|
||||
- All 5 test scenarios executed successfully
|
||||
- All JSON outputs are valid and properly structured
|
||||
- All embedded `opencode.json` configurations have required `$schema` and `instructions` fields
|
||||
- Instruction counts match expected values for each scenario
|
||||
- Rule content quality is high across concern, language, and framework rules
|
||||
- Shell hook properly generates symlink and configuration file
|
||||
|
||||
### Notes
|
||||
- Socket file issue requires workaround (documented)
|
||||
- Module correctly handles default concerns, multiple languages, frameworks, and custom instructions
|
||||
- Code examples in rules are clear and actionable
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user