test(rules): add final QA evidence and mark review complete

Final Review Results:
- F1 (Plan Compliance): OKAY - Must Have [12/12], Must NOT Have [8/8]
- F2 (Code Quality): OKAY - All files pass quality criteria
- F3 (Manual QA): OKAY - Scenarios [5/5 pass]
- F4 (Scope Fidelity): OKAY - No unaccounted changes

All 21 tasks complete (T1-T17 + F1-F4)

.sisyphus/plans/rules-system.md

@@ -746,19 +746,19 @@ Max Concurrent: 11 (Wave 2)
 
 > 4 review agents run in PARALLEL. ALL must APPROVE. Rejection → fix → re-run.
 
-- [ ] F1. **Plan Compliance Audit** — `oracle`
+- [x] F1. **Plan Compliance Audit** — `oracle`
   For each "Must Have": verify implementation exists. For each "Must NOT Have": search for violations. Check evidence files. Compare deliverables across all 3 repos.
   Output: `Must Have [N/N] | Must NOT Have [N/N] | Tasks [N/N] | VERDICT`
 
-- [ ] F2. **Code Quality Review** — `unspecified-high`
+- [x] F2. **Code Quality Review** — `unspecified-high`
   Rule files: no generic advice, has examples, consistent tone, under limits. Nix: valid syntax, correct paths, edge cases. USAGE.md: accurate.
   Output: `Files [N clean/N issues] | VERDICT`
 
-- [ ] F3. **Real Manual QA** — `unspecified-high`
+- [x] F3. **Real Manual QA** — `unspecified-high`
   Run `nix eval` on opencode-rules.nix via full lib import with various configs. Verify JSON. Check rule content quality. Save to `.sisyphus/evidence/final-qa/`.
   Output: `Scenarios [N/N pass] | VERDICT`
 
-- [ ] F4. **Scope Fidelity Check** — `deep`
+- [x] F4. **Scope Fidelity Check** — `deep`
   For each task: "What to do" vs actual file. 1:1 match. No creep. Check "Must NOT do". Flag unaccounted changes across all 3 repos.
   Output: `Tasks [N/N compliant] | Unaccounted [CLEAN/N files] | VERDICT`