test(rules): add final QA evidence and mark review complete

Final Review Results:
- F1 (Plan Compliance): OKAY - Must Have [12/12], Must NOT Have [8/8]
- F2 (Code Quality): OKAY - All files pass quality criteria
- F3 (Manual QA): OKAY - Scenarios [5/5 pass]
- F4 (Scope Fidelity): OKAY - No unaccounted changes

All 21 tasks complete (T1-T17 + F1-F4)
This commit is contained in:
m3tm3re
2026-02-17 19:31:24 +01:00
parent 4e9da366e4
commit 5b204c95e4
7 changed files with 162 additions and 4 deletions

View File

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
{"instructions":[".opencode-rules/concerns/coding-style.md",".opencode-rules/concerns/naming.md",".opencode-rules/concerns/documentation.md",".opencode-rules/concerns/testing.md",".opencode-rules/concerns/git-workflow.md",".opencode-rules/concerns/project-structure.md"],"shellHook":"# Create/update symlink to AGENTS rules directory\nln -sfn /nix/store/wsqzf0z3hg8mhpq484f24fm72qp4k6sg-AGENTS/rules .opencode-rules\n\n# Generate opencode.json configuration file\ncat > opencode.json <<'OPENCODE_EOF'\n{\"$schema\":\"https://opencode.ai/config.json\",\"instructions\":[\".opencode-rules/concerns/coding-style.md\",\".opencode-rules/concerns/naming.md\",\".opencode-rules/concerns/documentation.md\",\".opencode-rules/concerns/testing.md\",\".opencode-rules/concerns/git-workflow.md\",\".opencode-rules/concerns/project-structure.md\"]}\nOPENCODE_EOF\n"}

View File

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
{"instructions":[".opencode-rules/concerns/coding-style.md",".opencode-rules/concerns/naming.md",".opencode-rules/concerns/documentation.md",".opencode-rules/concerns/testing.md",".opencode-rules/concerns/git-workflow.md",".opencode-rules/concerns/project-structure.md",".opencode-rules/languages/python.md"],"shellHook":"# Create/update symlink to AGENTS rules directory\nln -sfn /nix/store/4li05383sgf4z0l6bxv8hmvgs600y56x-AGENTS/rules .opencode-rules\n\n# Generate opencode.json configuration file\ncat > opencode.json <<'OPENCODE_EOF'\n{\"$schema\":\"https://opencode.ai/config.json\",\"instructions\":[\".opencode-rules/concerns/coding-style.md\",\".opencode-rules/concerns/naming.md\",\".opencode-rules/concerns/documentation.md\",\".opencode-rules/concerns/testing.md\",\".opencode-rules/concerns/git-workflow.md\",\".opencode-rules/concerns/project-structure.md\",\".opencode-rules/languages/python.md\"]}\nOPENCODE_EOF\n"}

View File

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
{"instructions":[".opencode-rules/concerns/coding-style.md",".opencode-rules/concerns/naming.md",".opencode-rules/concerns/documentation.md",".opencode-rules/concerns/testing.md",".opencode-rules/concerns/git-workflow.md",".opencode-rules/concerns/project-structure.md",".opencode-rules/languages/python.md",".opencode-rules/languages/typescript.md",".opencode-rules/languages/nix.md",".opencode-rules/languages/shell.md"],"shellHook":"# Create/update symlink to AGENTS rules directory\nln -sfn /nix/store/qzsdn3m85qwarpd43x8k28sja40r21p7-AGENTS/rules .opencode-rules\n\n# Generate opencode.json configuration file\ncat > opencode.json <<'OPENCODE_EOF'\n{\"$schema\":\"https://opencode.ai/config.json\",\"instructions\":[\".opencode-rules/concerns/coding-style.md\",\".opencode-rules/concerns/naming.md\",\".opencode-rules/concerns/documentation.md\",\".opencode-rules/concerns/testing.md\",\".opencode-rules/concerns/git-workflow.md\",\".opencode-rules/concerns/project-structure.md\",\".opencode-rules/languages/python.md\",\".opencode-rules/languages/typescript.md\",\".opencode-rules/languages/nix.md\",\".opencode-rules/languages/shell.md\"]}\nOPENCODE_EOF\n"}

View File

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
{"instructions":[".opencode-rules/concerns/coding-style.md",".opencode-rules/concerns/naming.md",".opencode-rules/concerns/documentation.md",".opencode-rules/concerns/testing.md",".opencode-rules/concerns/git-workflow.md",".opencode-rules/concerns/project-structure.md",".opencode-rules/languages/python.md",".opencode-rules/frameworks/n8n.md"],"shellHook":"# Create/update symlink to AGENTS rules directory\nln -sfn /nix/store/55brjhy9m1vcgrnd100vmwf9bycjpzpi-AGENTS/rules .opencode-rules\n\n# Generate opencode.json configuration file\ncat > opencode.json <<'OPENCODE_EOF'\n{\"$schema\":\"https://opencode.ai/config.json\",\"instructions\":[\".opencode-rules/concerns/coding-style.md\",\".opencode-rules/concerns/naming.md\",\".opencode-rules/concerns/documentation.md\",\".opencode-rules/concerns/testing.md\",\".opencode-rules/concerns/git-workflow.md\",\".opencode-rules/concerns/project-structure.md\",\".opencode-rules/languages/python.md\",\".opencode-rules/frameworks/n8n.md\"]}\nOPENCODE_EOF\n"}

View File

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
{"instructions":[".opencode-rules/concerns/coding-style.md",".opencode-rules/concerns/naming.md",".opencode-rules/concerns/documentation.md",".opencode-rules/concerns/testing.md",".opencode-rules/concerns/git-workflow.md",".opencode-rules/concerns/project-structure.md",".opencode-rules/languages/python.md",".opencode-rules/custom.md"],"shellHook":"# Create/update symlink to AGENTS rules directory\nln -sfn /nix/store/r8yfirsyyii9x05qd5kfdvzcqv7sx6az-AGENTS/rules .opencode-rules\n\n# Generate opencode.json configuration file\ncat > opencode.json <<'OPENCODE_EOF'\n{\"$schema\":\"https://opencode.ai/config.json\",\"instructions\":[\".opencode-rules/concerns/coding-style.md\",\".opencode-rules/concerns/naming.md\",\".opencode-rules/concerns/documentation.md\",\".opencode-rules/concerns/testing.md\",\".opencode-rules/concerns/git-workflow.md\",\".opencode-rules/concerns/project-structure.md\",\".opencode-rules/languages/python.md\",\".opencode-rules/custom.md\"]}\nOPENCODE_EOF\n"}

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,153 @@
# Opencode Rules Nix Module - Manual QA Results
## Test Summary
Date: 2025-02-17
Module: `/home/m3tam3re/p/NIX/nixpkgs/lib/opencode-rules.nix`
Test Type: Manual QA (nix eval)
---
## Scenario Results
### Scenario 1: Empty Config (Defaults Only)
**Command**: `nix eval --impure --json --expr 'let pkgs = import <nixpkgs> {}; m3taLib = import /home/m3tam3re/p/NIX/nixpkgs/lib {lib = pkgs.lib;}; in m3taLib.opencode-rules.mkOpencodeRules { agents = /home/m3tam3re/p/AI/AGENTS; }'`
**Results**:
- ✅ Valid JSON output
- ✅ Has `$schema` field in embedded opencode.json
- ✅ Has `instructions` field
- ✅ Correct instruction count: 6 (default concerns only)
**Expected Instructions**:
1. `.opencode-rules/concerns/coding-style.md`
2. `.opencode-rules/concerns/naming.md`
3. `.opencode-rules/concerns/documentation.md`
4. `.opencode-rules/concerns/testing.md`
5. `.opencode-rules/concerns/git-workflow.md`
6. `.opencode-rules/concerns/project-structure.md`
---
### Scenario 2: Single Language (Python)
**Command**: `nix eval --impure --json --expr 'let pkgs = import <nixpkgs> {}; m3taLib = import /home/m3tam3re/p/NIX/nixpkgs/lib {lib = pkgs.lib;}; in m3taLib.opencode-rules.mkOpencodeRules { agents = /home/m3tam3re/p/AI/AGENTS; languages = ["python"]; }'`
**Results**:
- ✅ Valid JSON output
- ✅ Has `$schema` field in embedded opencode.json
- ✅ Has `instructions` field
- ✅ Correct instruction count: 7 (6 concerns + 1 language)
**Expected Instructions**:
- All 6 default concerns
- `.opencode-rules/languages/python.md`
---
### Scenario 3: Multi-Language
**Command**: `nix eval --impure --json --expr 'let pkgs = import <nixpkgs> {}; m3taLib = import /home/m3tam3re/p/NIX/nixpkgs/lib {lib = pkgs.lib;}; in m3taLib.opencode-rules.mkOpencodeRules { agents = /home/m3tam3re/p/AI/AGENTS; languages = ["python" "typescript" "nix" "shell"]; }'`
**Results**:
- ✅ Valid JSON output
- ✅ Has `$schema` field in embedded opencode.json
- ✅ Has `instructions` field
- ✅ Correct instruction count: 10 (6 concerns + 4 languages)
**Expected Instructions**:
- All 6 default concerns
- `.opencode-rules/languages/python.md`
- `.opencode-rules/languages/typescript.md`
- `.opencode-rules/languages/nix.md`
- `.opencode-rules/languages/shell.md`
---
### Scenario 4: With Frameworks
**Command**: `nix eval --impure --json --expr 'let pkgs = import <nixpkgs> {}; m3taLib = import /home/m3tam3re/p/NIX/nixpkgs/lib {lib = pkgs.lib;}; in m3taLib.opencode-rules.mkOpencodeRules { agents = /home/m3tam3re/p/AI/AGENTS; languages = ["python"]; frameworks = ["n8n"]; }'`
**Results**:
- ✅ Valid JSON output
- ✅ Has `$schema` field in embedded opencode.json
- ✅ Has `instructions` field
- ✅ Correct instruction count: 8 (6 concerns + 1 language + 1 framework)
**Expected Instructions**:
- All 6 default concerns
- `.opencode-rules/languages/python.md`
- `.opencode-rules/frameworks/n8n.md`
---
### Scenario 5: Extra Instructions
**Command**: `nix eval --impure --json --expr 'let pkgs = import <nixpkgs> {}; m3taLib = import /home/m3tam3re/p/NIX/nixpkgs/lib {lib = pkgs.lib;}; in m3taLib.opencode-rules.mkOpencodeRules { agents = /home/m3tam3re/p/AI/AGENTS; languages = ["python"]; extraInstructions = [".opencode-rules/custom.md"]; }'`
**Results**:
- ✅ Valid JSON output
- ✅ Has `$schema` field in embedded opencode.json
- ✅ Has `instructions` field
- ✅ Correct instruction count: 8 (6 concerns + 1 language + 1 custom)
**Expected Instructions**:
- All 6 default concerns
- `.opencode-rules/languages/python.md`
- `.opencode-rules/custom.md`
---
## Content Quality Spot Checks
### 1. coding-style.md (Concern Rule)
**Assessment**: ✅ High Quality
- Clear critical rules with "Always/Never" directives
- Good vs. bad code examples
- Comprehensive coverage: formatting, patterns, error handling, type safety, function design, SOLID
- Well-structured sections
### 2. python.md (Language Rule)
**Assessment**: ✅ High Quality
- Modern toolchain recommendations (uv, ruff, pyright, pytest, hypothesis)
- Common idioms with practical examples
- Anti-patterns with explanations
- Project setup structure
- Clear, actionable code snippets
### 3. n8n.md (Framework Rule)
**Assessment**: ✅ High Quality
- Concise workflow design principles
- Clear naming conventions
- Error handling patterns
- Security best practices
- Actionable testing guidelines
---
## Issues Encountered
### Socket File Issue
**Issue**: `nix eval` failed with `error: file '/home/m3tam3re/p/AI/AGENTS/.beads/bd.sock' has an unsupported type`
**Workaround**: Temporarily moved `.beads` directory outside the AGENTS tree during testing
**Root Cause**: Nix attempts to evaluate/store the `agents` path recursively and encounters unsupported socket files (Unix domain sockets)
**Recommendation**: Consider adding `.beads` to `.gitignore` and excluding it from path evaluation if possible, or document this limitation for users
---
## Final Verdict
```
Scenarios [5/5 pass] | VERDICT: OKAY
```
### Summary
- All 5 test scenarios executed successfully
- All JSON outputs are valid and properly structured
- All embedded `opencode.json` configurations have required `$schema` and `instructions` fields
- Instruction counts match expected values for each scenario
- Rule content quality is high across concern, language, and framework rules
- Shell hook properly generates symlink and configuration file
### Notes
- Socket file issue requires workaround (documented)
- Module correctly handles default concerns, multiple languages, frameworks, and custom instructions
- Code examples in rules are clear and actionable

View File

@@ -746,19 +746,19 @@ Max Concurrent: 11 (Wave 2)
> 4 review agents run in PARALLEL. ALL must APPROVE. Rejection → fix → re-run. > 4 review agents run in PARALLEL. ALL must APPROVE. Rejection → fix → re-run.
- [ ] F1. **Plan Compliance Audit** — `oracle` - [x] F1. **Plan Compliance Audit** — `oracle`
For each "Must Have": verify implementation exists. For each "Must NOT Have": search for violations. Check evidence files. Compare deliverables across all 3 repos. For each "Must Have": verify implementation exists. For each "Must NOT Have": search for violations. Check evidence files. Compare deliverables across all 3 repos.
Output: `Must Have [N/N] | Must NOT Have [N/N] | Tasks [N/N] | VERDICT` Output: `Must Have [N/N] | Must NOT Have [N/N] | Tasks [N/N] | VERDICT`
- [ ] F2. **Code Quality Review** — `unspecified-high` - [x] F2. **Code Quality Review** — `unspecified-high`
Rule files: no generic advice, has examples, consistent tone, under limits. Nix: valid syntax, correct paths, edge cases. USAGE.md: accurate. Rule files: no generic advice, has examples, consistent tone, under limits. Nix: valid syntax, correct paths, edge cases. USAGE.md: accurate.
Output: `Files [N clean/N issues] | VERDICT` Output: `Files [N clean/N issues] | VERDICT`
- [ ] F3. **Real Manual QA** — `unspecified-high` - [x] F3. **Real Manual QA** — `unspecified-high`
Run `nix eval` on opencode-rules.nix via full lib import with various configs. Verify JSON. Check rule content quality. Save to `.sisyphus/evidence/final-qa/`. Run `nix eval` on opencode-rules.nix via full lib import with various configs. Verify JSON. Check rule content quality. Save to `.sisyphus/evidence/final-qa/`.
Output: `Scenarios [N/N pass] | VERDICT` Output: `Scenarios [N/N pass] | VERDICT`
- [ ] F4. **Scope Fidelity Check** — `deep` - [x] F4. **Scope Fidelity Check** — `deep`
For each task: "What to do" vs actual file. 1:1 match. No creep. Check "Must NOT do". Flag unaccounted changes across all 3 repos. For each task: "What to do" vs actual file. 1:1 match. No creep. Check "Must NOT do". Flag unaccounted changes across all 3 repos.
Output: `Tasks [N/N compliant] | Unaccounted [CLEAN/N files] | VERDICT` Output: `Tasks [N/N compliant] | Unaccounted [CLEAN/N files] | VERDICT`