# Opencode Rules Nix Module - Manual QA Results ## Test Summary Date: 2025-02-17 Module: `/home/m3tam3re/p/NIX/nixpkgs/lib/opencode-rules.nix` Test Type: Manual QA (nix eval) --- ## Scenario Results ### Scenario 1: Empty Config (Defaults Only) **Command**: `nix eval --impure --json --expr 'let pkgs = import {}; m3taLib = import /home/m3tam3re/p/NIX/nixpkgs/lib {lib = pkgs.lib;}; in m3taLib.opencode-rules.mkOpencodeRules { agents = /home/m3tam3re/p/AI/AGENTS; }'` **Results**: - ✅ Valid JSON output - ✅ Has `$schema` field in embedded opencode.json - ✅ Has `instructions` field - ✅ Correct instruction count: 6 (default concerns only) **Expected Instructions**: 1. `.opencode-rules/concerns/coding-style.md` 2. `.opencode-rules/concerns/naming.md` 3. `.opencode-rules/concerns/documentation.md` 4. `.opencode-rules/concerns/testing.md` 5. `.opencode-rules/concerns/git-workflow.md` 6. `.opencode-rules/concerns/project-structure.md` --- ### Scenario 2: Single Language (Python) **Command**: `nix eval --impure --json --expr 'let pkgs = import {}; m3taLib = import /home/m3tam3re/p/NIX/nixpkgs/lib {lib = pkgs.lib;}; in m3taLib.opencode-rules.mkOpencodeRules { agents = /home/m3tam3re/p/AI/AGENTS; languages = ["python"]; }'` **Results**: - ✅ Valid JSON output - ✅ Has `$schema` field in embedded opencode.json - ✅ Has `instructions` field - ✅ Correct instruction count: 7 (6 concerns + 1 language) **Expected Instructions**: - All 6 default concerns - `.opencode-rules/languages/python.md` --- ### Scenario 3: Multi-Language **Command**: `nix eval --impure --json --expr 'let pkgs = import {}; m3taLib = import /home/m3tam3re/p/NIX/nixpkgs/lib {lib = pkgs.lib;}; in m3taLib.opencode-rules.mkOpencodeRules { agents = /home/m3tam3re/p/AI/AGENTS; languages = ["python" "typescript" "nix" "shell"]; }'` **Results**: - ✅ Valid JSON output - ✅ Has `$schema` field in embedded opencode.json - ✅ Has `instructions` field - ✅ Correct instruction count: 10 (6 concerns + 4 languages) **Expected Instructions**: - All 6 default concerns - `.opencode-rules/languages/python.md` - `.opencode-rules/languages/typescript.md` - `.opencode-rules/languages/nix.md` - `.opencode-rules/languages/shell.md` --- ### Scenario 4: With Frameworks **Command**: `nix eval --impure --json --expr 'let pkgs = import {}; m3taLib = import /home/m3tam3re/p/NIX/nixpkgs/lib {lib = pkgs.lib;}; in m3taLib.opencode-rules.mkOpencodeRules { agents = /home/m3tam3re/p/AI/AGENTS; languages = ["python"]; frameworks = ["n8n"]; }'` **Results**: - ✅ Valid JSON output - ✅ Has `$schema` field in embedded opencode.json - ✅ Has `instructions` field - ✅ Correct instruction count: 8 (6 concerns + 1 language + 1 framework) **Expected Instructions**: - All 6 default concerns - `.opencode-rules/languages/python.md` - `.opencode-rules/frameworks/n8n.md` --- ### Scenario 5: Extra Instructions **Command**: `nix eval --impure --json --expr 'let pkgs = import {}; m3taLib = import /home/m3tam3re/p/NIX/nixpkgs/lib {lib = pkgs.lib;}; in m3taLib.opencode-rules.mkOpencodeRules { agents = /home/m3tam3re/p/AI/AGENTS; languages = ["python"]; extraInstructions = [".opencode-rules/custom.md"]; }'` **Results**: - ✅ Valid JSON output - ✅ Has `$schema` field in embedded opencode.json - ✅ Has `instructions` field - ✅ Correct instruction count: 8 (6 concerns + 1 language + 1 custom) **Expected Instructions**: - All 6 default concerns - `.opencode-rules/languages/python.md` - `.opencode-rules/custom.md` --- ## Content Quality Spot Checks ### 1. coding-style.md (Concern Rule) **Assessment**: ✅ High Quality - Clear critical rules with "Always/Never" directives - Good vs. bad code examples - Comprehensive coverage: formatting, patterns, error handling, type safety, function design, SOLID - Well-structured sections ### 2. python.md (Language Rule) **Assessment**: ✅ High Quality - Modern toolchain recommendations (uv, ruff, pyright, pytest, hypothesis) - Common idioms with practical examples - Anti-patterns with explanations - Project setup structure - Clear, actionable code snippets ### 3. n8n.md (Framework Rule) **Assessment**: ✅ High Quality - Concise workflow design principles - Clear naming conventions - Error handling patterns - Security best practices - Actionable testing guidelines --- ## Issues Encountered ### Socket File Issue **Issue**: `nix eval` failed with `error: file '/home/m3tam3re/p/AI/AGENTS/.beads/bd.sock' has an unsupported type` **Workaround**: Temporarily moved `.beads` directory outside the AGENTS tree during testing **Root Cause**: Nix attempts to evaluate/store the `agents` path recursively and encounters unsupported socket files (Unix domain sockets) **Recommendation**: Consider adding `.beads` to `.gitignore` and excluding it from path evaluation if possible, or document this limitation for users --- ## Final Verdict ``` Scenarios [5/5 pass] | VERDICT: OKAY ``` ### Summary - All 5 test scenarios executed successfully - All JSON outputs are valid and properly structured - All embedded `opencode.json` configurations have required `$schema` and `instructions` fields - Instruction counts match expected values for each scenario - Rule content quality is high across concern, language, and framework rules - Shell hook properly generates symlink and configuration file ### Notes - Socket file issue requires workaround (documented) - Module correctly handles default concerns, multiple languages, frameworks, and custom instructions - Code examples in rules are clear and actionable